<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Airline Passenger Data</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/8/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>German Protests in over 30 cities against surveillance</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.13/german-protests-surveillance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1035&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 31 May 2008, privacy activists organized new rallies in more than 30
cities across Germany.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Following the November 2007 protests under the motto &amp;quot;Freedom not
Fear&amp;quot;(&amp;quot;Freiheit statt Angst&amp;quot;), thousands of citizens participated in this
year street actions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Numerous demonstrations, rallies, information events, as well as workshops
and art performances sent clear signals to protect constitutional rights and
limit the rampant proliferation of surveillance.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The rallies had the goal of demonstrating to the ruling grand coalition, a
decisive NO of citizens to the blanket collection and storage of data, as
well
as to the surveillance of all details of daily life. The activities were
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:57:55 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title> The US-EU agreement on personal data exchange by law enforcement</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.13/us-eu-personal-data-exchange</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1031&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As stated by the New York Times on 26 June 2008, the United States and the
European Union are close to conclude an agreement allowing the exchange of
personal data of their citizens, including credit card information, travel
history and Internet browsing information in order to be shared with the law
enforcement and security agencies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to an internal report revealed by the newspaper, the potential
agreement that has been negotiated since February 2007 between the US
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Justice and State departments and
their European counterparts will make clear that it is lawful for European
governments and companies to transfer personal information to the United
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:52:56 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eurobarometers on data protection in EU</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/eurobarometer-data-protection</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/966&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
--- Version corrected on 24.04.2008---
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to a couple of Eurobarometer surveys on data protection, issued by
the European Commission on 17 April 2008, EU citizens have little faith in
the security of data transmission on the Internet.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Two surveys were conducted by Gallup in January 2008, investigating the
perceptions on data protection among EU citizens and data controllers
respectively. The surveys involved about 27000 EU citizens and 5000
companies from all 27 member states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The findings of the surveys show that 82% of European Internet users have
little trust in personal data management on the Internet and 64% of EU
citizens are concerned about data protection issues feeling that the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:24:28 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PNR Data infringes human rights</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/pnr-human-rights-ecj</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/956&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The German Working Group on Data Retention expanded its activities beyond
the data retention issues, by publishing two applications to the European
Court of Justice by the European Parliament contesting the transfer of PNR
data to the US.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The documents explain why the collection of air passenger data in the US
as well as a similar proposal by EU commissioner Franco Frattini are
incompatible with the air travellers&#039; fundamental rights. First, the blanket
collection of all PNR data violates the basic right to privacy and
protection of our personal data. The finality of the data retained is not
precisely defined; a &amp;quot;blank cheque&amp;quot; is given to the authorities permitting
an unforeseeable use of the data for other purposes. Also, sensitive data
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:20:40 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Czechs became Trojan horses for new US visa waiver programme</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.6/czech-us-visa-waiver</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/937&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Czech Republic Interior Minister Ivan Langer and U.S. Homeland Security
Secretary Michael Chertoff signed on 26 February 2008 in Washington D.C. the
Memorandum of Understanding which is the first step in introducing new
electronic visa programme for all EU countries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In this Memorandum Czech authorities agreed to &amp;quot;passenger and other
information sharing, screening information concerning known or suspected
terrorists, information to combat terrorism and serious crime, and
information on migration matters&amp;quot; with the US authorities and also promised
to &amp;quot;allow for the further dissemination of transferred information within
the United States Government&amp;quot;. Czech Ministry of Interior agreed &amp;quot;to provide
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>High Level Contact Group talks about EU-US personal data issues</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.5/eu-us-personal-data-group</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/911&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to a document revealed by Statewatch, the EU and US are
negotiating the data protection principles for which common language has
been developed. The Group has as purpose to draft a proposal that should
deal with the personal data protection in any future EU-US agreements that
will deal with this topic.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In November 2007 Paul Rosenzweig, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy at
the US DHS said, on the EU requirement, that data could only be passed to
third states whose laws passed the &amp;quot;adequacy&amp;quot; test guaranteeing equivalent
rights:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The EU should reconsider its decision to apply notions of adequacy to the
critical area of law enforcement and public safety. Otherwise the EU runs
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Biometric data from non-EU travellers</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.3/biometric-eu-travel</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/862&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A set of new measures including biometric data from non-EU travellers are
being proposed these days by the European Commission (EC). The proposals,
drafted by Franco Frattini, the European Commissioner for Justice, Freedom
and Security, are being put forward by the EC, arguing that the cross-border
policy has to be revised to face the new challenges related to terrorism,
organised crime and illegal migration.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The package proposes the creation of an entry/exit register of non-European
visitors to the EU bloc that will record the dates of entry and exit of each
non-EU individual admitted to the Schengen visa-free area using biometric
identifiers. In cases when a person&#039;s visa has expired, an alert can be
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Main data protection concerns with the EU policy developments in 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.2/eu-data-protection-2007</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/850&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Lisbon Treaty was signed in December 2007. Notwithstanding the
many critics raised by this Treaty, the text, when ratified by all
member States, will bring two major improvements to the EU and its
citizens. First, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European
Union will become part of the Community acquis, including its
articles 7 (Respect for private and family life) and 8 (Protection of
personal data). Secondly, the Treaty will allow the accession of the EU
to the European Convention on Human Rights and, hence, will give EU
citizens the possibility of being protected against abuses of their
human rights by EU institutions. This improvement would be much
welcome, especially - though not exclusively - considering the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Key privacy concerns in Czech Republik 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.2/privacy-czech-2007</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/845&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last year has seen an increased number attempts from government bodies to
extend their powers and make it easier to access people&#039;s private
information. To name a few, there were legal proposals to increase the
number of agencies authorized to access and process electronic
communication data collected by telecommunication companies under the
Data Retention law, national DNA database enlargement, plans for various
administrative database sharing, introduction of even more CCTV systems
and the pressure on air travel operators to share records about their
passengers. The introduction of biometric into travel documents data as a
mean of identification and the use of contactless chip technologies
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recommended Action</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.21/action</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/726&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Privacy International in a coalition with over 50 other organisations from
around the world, including EDRI, is in the process of appealing for the
imminent implementation of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition
Act by the Japan&#039;s Ministry of Justice. The act will make fingerprint and
face-scan compulsory for Japan&#039;s visitors and foreign residents. The
campaign will be launched later this week.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If any organisation wants to endorse this privacy campaign, please contact
as soon as possible Gus Hosein - Privacy International - gus at privacy.org.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EC plans to profile all passengers in and out EU</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.21/eu-pnr</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/720&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Commission(EC) put forward on 6 November 2007 a PNR plan that
is almost similar to the EU-USA PNR (Passenger Name Records) agreement. The
EU PNR plan is part of a new package of proposals &amp;quot;aimed at improving the
EU&#039;s capabilities in the fight against terrorism.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to this proposal, EU will have to collect 19 pieces of personal
data on air passengers coming into and leaving the EU space, including phone
number, e-mail address, travel agent, full itinerary, billing data and
baggage information. The information will be collected in analysis units
that will make a &amp;quot;risk assessment&amp;quot; of the traveller, which could lead to
the questioning or even refusal of the entry. The data is to be kept for
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US gains new advantages in the EU-USA PNR agreement</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.17/us-pnr-new</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In some recently published documents, Statewatch revealed that very soon
after the EU-USA agreement on PNR (passenger name record) was signed on 28
June 2007, the US government announced some changes in its Privacy Act that
give exemptions from responding to request for personal information held to
DHS (Department of Homeland Security) and ATS (Automated Targeting System).
US Government also sent a written request to the Council of EU to agree on
keeping secret all the documents on the negotiations for at least 10 years.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The declared purpose of the above-mentioned exemptions is for &amp;quot;national
security, law enforcement, immigration and intelligence activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect information relating to DHS investigatory
and enforcement activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:46:19 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Czech government accepts the new PNR agreement with reservations</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.15/czech-pnr-reservations</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/592&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On the 18 July 2007, the Czech government approved, with signficant
reservations, the new PNR agreement prepared by the European Commission with
the US Department for Homeland Security (DHS).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
During the short period of consultations among the Czech authorities and
politicians on the new agreement, the Czech Data Protection Authority stated
that the current proposal deteriorated the level of protection of personal
data. The Czech Data Protection Authority however did not clearly oppose the
new agreement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Following the EDRi-member Iuridicum Remedium lobbing activities, the Green
Party MP Katerina Jacques took up the position of the privacy activists
group and pushed for stricter and more binding assurances to protect data of
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:06:10 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European Parliament adopts harsh resolution on the new PNR agreement</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.14/EP-PNR-resolution</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/573&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 10 July 2007 the members of the European Parliament (EP) adopted with an
overwhelming majority, close to 90%, a Resolution that heavily criticizes
the new PNR agreement struck by the European Commission with the US
Department for Homeland Security (DHS), considering it &amp;quot;substantively
flawed&amp;quot;, in particular by &amp;quot;open and vague definitions and multiple
possibilities for exception&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The EP considers that the new deal still fails to offer an adequate level of
data protection and that it has been concluded without any involvement of
parliaments from both sides, lacking democratic oversight. The resolution
explains what are the main weak points of the agreement:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
a. The handling, collection, use and storage of personal data from air
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:31:54 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Final agreements between EU and USA on PNR and SWIFT</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.13/eu-us-pnr-swift</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/554&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
After a long and difficult period of negotiations, on 28-29 June 2007, final
agreements were reached between EU and USA on the data regarding European
financial transactions operated by Belgian consortium SWIFT and on the
passenger name records (PNR) issue respectively.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Regarding the access to financial data from SWIFT, the US has committed to
use any data received from SWIFT exclusively for counter-terrorism purposes,
the data retention period being of 5 years.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
SWIFT is also bound to &amp;quot;adequately&amp;quot; protect the privacy of data according to
EU principles as laid out in 2000 and further more, from now on, all banks
using SWIFT will have to inform their customers about any transfers of their
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:54:27 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
