<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Compulsory Identification</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/7/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The European Commission continues to pressure for early fingerprinting</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/ec-fingerprinting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/957&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In spite of the recommendation of the European Data Protection Supervisor,
Peter Hustinx, that the minimum age for fingerprinting should be 14, a
spokesperson from the European Commission (EC) expressed on 2 April 2008 the
EC intention to push for fingerprinting children starting at the age of six,
in order to include the information in the biometric passports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Jacques Barrot, the Justice, Freedom and Security Commissioner, considered
that &amp;quot;The proposals we put forward are balanced ones&amp;quot;, explaining that
fingerprinting was an important tool in fighting human trafficking.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
During the meeting on 12 February 2008 the high-level Strategic Committee on
Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum (SCIFA)/Mixed Committee discussed the age
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:21:40 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK beat police will have access to national mugshot database</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.6/uk-police-mugshot-database</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/940&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 18 March 2008, Peter Neyroud, the chief executive of the UK National
Police Improvement Agency (NPIA), told the Commons Home Affairs Committee,
during the final evidence session of a year-long inquiry on the surveillance
society, that the police was developing a national database of mugshots to
be used with face recognition technology that would match CCTV images with
offenders.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A pilot system has started with three local police forces that have gathered
during the last 18 months a database including more than 750 000 face
images. About 7.7 million euro has been allocated so far on developing the
technology that will be nationally launched in 2009.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Neyroud stated that he hoped to have the beat police equipped with advanced
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Information Commissioner warns against fingerprinting at new UK terminal</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.6/ico-heathrow-terminal-5</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/938&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mr. Richard Thomas, UK Information Commissioner warned Heathrow airport
operator BAA that the plans to fingerprint all passengers at the new
Terminal 5 may breach the UK Data Protection Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 5.5 billion euro worth Terminal 5 was opened by the Queen on 16 March
and is due to receive its first passengers on 27 March 2008. The airport
plans to apply security measures that involve fingerprinting all passengers
including domestic ones claiming fingerprinting was necessary so that all
passengers could mix freely in Terminal 5 shopping mall area. Fingerprinting
is already being applied for domestic passengers at Terminal 1. The
passengers place a hand on a scanner which records four fingerprints and
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wales said no to ID cards</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.3/id-cards-wales</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/869&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Welsh Assembly Government proposal for a &amp;quot;smart card&amp;quot; to be used to access
public services in Wales was considered by civil liberties groups as a way
of introducing identity cards &amp;quot;through the back door&amp;quot; and was rejected by
the Liberal Democrats supported by the Labour Party members as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Government has claimed that the card was aimed at improving the way
people use library and travel services but Suw Charman, founder of the
EDRi-member Open Rights Group, considers the scheme as &amp;quot;pointless&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;I
haven&#039;t seen an argument about what&#039;s wrong with the existing cards. (...)
Why do we need to put all this information on one smart card that&#039;s going to
keep a log on what people do and where they go? It&#039;s treating people like
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PI: Leading surveillance societies in the EU and the World 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/leading-surveillance-societies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/823&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UK-based human rights group Privacy International (PI) published at the
end of last year the 2007 ranking assessment of the state of privacy in 47
countries, including all European Union member states.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The raking is based on the Privacy &amp;amp; Human Rights reports produced since
1997 by PI together with US-based Electronic Privacy Information Center and
is taking into consideration several criteria such as constitutional &amp;amp;
statutory protection and privacy enforcement, biometric ID
cards, data-sharing, video surveillance, communication interceptions and
data retention.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to the authors, the project wants to &amp;quot;recognize countries in which
privacy protection and respect for privacy is nurtured. This is done in the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Civil liberties threatened by the new centralized EU fingerprint database</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.6/fingerprint-database-eu</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/438&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A proposal for the creation of a centralized database of fingerprints from
all 27 EU countries was included in a new European Commission document that
sets out the goals for 2008.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The fingerprints database is to be operational by the end of 2008 and it
will include sensitive information that could be shared with third parties,
such as US law enforcement authorities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This proposal, considered as a Big Brother type of initiative, has raised
the opposition of the sceptics as well as supporters of EU being seen as a
trap of a super-state as well as a threat to civil liberties respectively.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;The European Union is gaining criminal justice powers very rapidly. The
problem is that one thing leads to another and that setting up centralised
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:14:51 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>French High Court cancels the creation of illegal migrants database</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.5/france-cancels-database</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/423&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In a decision published on 13 March, the Conseil d&#039;État, the French
highest administrative court, cancelled the ministerial order
(&amp;quot;Arrêté&amp;quot;) by which the Interior Ministry created the ELOI file, a
database aimed at facilitating the expulsion of illegal migrants. On
2 October 2006, four French NGOs filed this case against the
Interior minister: CIMADE and GISTI (two associations defending the
rights of migrants), LDH (the French Human Rights League), and French
EDRI member IRIS. While the database creation itself is allowed by
the French code on immigration and asylum (CESEDA), the NGOs argued
that the ELOI file would contain excessive and inadequate personal
data on the foreigners themselves, their children, the citizens with
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK Home Office plans to fingerprint children starting 11</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.5/uk-fingerprint-children</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/427&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Restricted&amp;quot; documents circulated among officials in the UK Identity and
Passport have shown Home Office plans to fingerprint children aged 11 years
and over, beginning with 2010, as part of the programme for the introduction
of new biometric passports and ID cards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The fingerprints are to be stored in a big database expected to cover about
half a million children by 2011 that will be also used by the Immigration
and Nationality Directorate to store fingerprints of asylum seekers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The programme of introducing biometric elements on ID cards foresees that
all citizens over 16 will be taken fingerprints, eye and facial details when
applying for passports. Initially, children were supposed to be exempt from
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Serbia rejects biometric ID cards</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.2/serbia-id-cards</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/387&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A grass-roots campaign in Serbia successfully pressed the Serbian government
to back off on a plan to make biometric data compulsory in the country&#039;s new
ID cards.  The decision followed a pitched battle prior to the 21 January
2007 election as opponents criticized the accompanying plan for a
centralized database of citizen information and the taking of fingerprints.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The campaign against the Government plan practically started in December
2004, when the Dveri NGO organized a public debate at the College of
Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade. In March 2005, the Zhicha Bishoprie
of the Serbian Orthodox Church organized a scientific forum, from which a
number of IT professionals, university professors and intellectuals sent a
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Changes in the UK ID card scheme</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.1/uk_id</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/373&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The initial plan of the UK Government regarding the national ID scheme was
meant to use photographs, fingerprints and iris scans in a National
Identity Register. The Home Office&#039;s Strategic Action Plan for the National
Identity Scheme considers now that the iris scans is just an option
and only the ten fingerprints will be taken for each new applicant.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to Home Office officials, the iris scan was dropped due to the
high costs of this process. They also claimed the decision was also related
&amp;quot;with international obligations, most international countries are using
facial and fingerprint recognition so it is to come in line with that.&amp;quot;
However, a return to iris scanning in the future could still be possible.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FIPR report on children&#039;s databases - likely to harm rather than help</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.22/fipr-children-database</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/321&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The UK Information Commissioner has just published a report on the UK
Government&#039;s plans to link up most of the public-sector databases that
contain information on children. The report was written by experts
from the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR), who
conclude that aggregating this data will be both unsafe and illegal.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The report, &#039;Children&#039;s Databases: Safety and Privacy&#039;, analyses
databases being built to collate information on children in education,
youth justice, health, social work and elsewhere. Although linking the
databases is supposed to safeguard children, the report&#039;s authors
point out that extending Britain&#039;s child protection systems - from
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK biometric passports project set back by simple cloning possibilities</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.22/uk-passports</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/315&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
UK Government faces now a big problem related to the introduction of the new
biometric passports as recently it has been proven these passports can be
easily and very cheaply copied by means of a microchip reader that can be
legally bought on the Internet.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As a big embarrassment to the Home Office, a project having led to the
increase of the travel documents by 60 per cent since March 2006, and that
brought about 90 million euro costs for the passport production lines, may
be entirely dropped as the new passports are more a risk for their owners
rather than an improvement to the old documents.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Three million people now have passports that expose them to a greater risk
of identity fraud than before.&amp;quot; said Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat home
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/rfid">RFID</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EU trying to push again biometrics on national ID cards</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.15/euidcards</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/207&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to a EU document presented by Statewatch in July 2006, The Visa
Working Party on 13-14 June 2006 proposed another approach on the issue of
the biometrics to be introduced on national ID cards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The issue had met resistance back in February when several members of the
European Council have expressed doubts especially as Belgium and the Czech
Republic opposed to the measures proposed by EU, without a public
debate.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In December 2005 the two governments gave a statement by which expressed
their view that the introduction of biometrics into the ID national cards
involved discussions of private life protection, financial and
organizational issues, besides the technical aspect.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:22:23 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EU might fingerprint children even before 12 years old</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.15/fingerprint</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/204&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The report from the EU Council Presidency meeting of 26 June 2006 proposes
that all children in the European Union should be mandatory fingerprinted if
they are over 12 years old. &amp;quot;If provided for by national legislation&amp;quot;  this
action could be extended to all children, even below 12 years of age.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Council is putting under discussion fingerprints as compulsory for EU
passports in order to prevent passport fraud. The decision will be taken in
a secret  meeting of a committee made of representatives of the 25
governments and chaired by the European Commission.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The text proposed by the EU Council says that a member state can establish
the age limit as low as they want and after 12, this process is mandatory.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:18:19 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK ID card scheme heading to failure</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.14/idcardsuk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/195&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Reports by The Sunday Times newspaper revealed an apparent failure of the UK
plans for ID cards resulting from an exchange of emails between David Foord,
the ID card project director at the Office of Government Commerce, and Peter
Smith, the acting commercial director of the Identity and Passport Service
(IPS).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The email sent in June by David Foord suggested ministers would be forced to
rethink the plans in order to meet the deadlines of introducing the cards by
2008. Peter Smith replied that his staff were prepared for the possibility
that ministers would drop the ID card plan altogether. He also said the Home
Office was making sure bigger contracts for projects linked to the ID card
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:37:56 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
