<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - EU Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/33/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Extension of the copyright term for performers and record producers</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.15/extension-copyright-performers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1064&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 16 July 2008, disregarding the well substantiated findings and opinions
of the Amsterdam Institute for Information Law, the Cambridge Study for the
UK Government and the Bournemouth University statement signed by 50 leading
academics in June 2008, the European Commission (EC) adopted an initiative
proposing the extension of the copyright term for the recorded performances
as well as records.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Actually, two initiatives were adopted by the European Commission
related to copyright, proposing the extension of the copyright term for the
recorded performances and phonograms and the harmonisation of the
copyright term to cover co-written works as well. The EC also adopted a
Green Paper on Copyright in the Knowledge Economy.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:20:51 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Vote in the EP committees on the Telecom Package</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/vote-ep-telecom</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1044&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The IMCO (Internal Market Committee) and ITRE (Committee on Industry,
Research and Energy) committees of the European Parliament (EP) adopted on
the 7 July 2008 the Telecom package, including the amendments that were
considered by some NGOs as endangering the principle of the neutrality of
the Internet.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One of the MEPs supervising the Telecom package, including the amendments to
the five directives that should reform the EU legal framework on electronic
communications has explained that the vote on these amendments had nothing
to do with copyright enforcement: &amp;quot;There has been a great deal of dismay in
the committee at the interpretation being put on these amendments.(...) The
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/spam/eu">EU directive on privacy and electronic communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:49:06 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Updates on Visa Information System Regulation</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.10/vis-regulation-update</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/991&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
An updated version of the Regulation on the Visa Information System (VIS)
published by Statewatch reveals that only random checks might be carried
out, if there are too many people waiting.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As already presented in EDRi-gram, the legislative package on the Visa
Information System that included the VIS Regulation has been adopted by the
European Parliament. The system will allow fingerprinting and checking
security of all visitors to EU that apply for a visa in their home country.
All the details, including fingerprints are held on the central VIS database
so that on entry to and exit from the EU identity checks can be carried out.
The VIS Regulation will allow consulates and other competent authorities to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:33:29 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EDPS wants data protection considered by EU research projects</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.9/edps-research-projects</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/983&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Peter Hustinx, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) wants privacy
and data protection requirements to be considered in the future EU research
and technological development (RTD) projects, especially those developing
information and communication technologies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The EDPS&#039; main role is to monitor EU developments which have an impact on
the protection of personal data, especially the development of ICT and &amp;quot;to
advise the Commission and/or project developers on their efforts to use
privacy and data protection-friendly RTD methodologies and of course to
develop technologies and processes that will promote and reinforce the
effectiveness of the EU data protection legal framework&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:42:05 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EDPS endorses data breach notification provision in ePrivacy Directive</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/edps-data-breach-notification</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/963&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) has issued his opinion on the
new draft text of the Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications
(ePrivacy Directive) as proposed by the European Commission.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One of the important changes supported by the EDPS with the new text is the
creation of a mandatory security breach notification system. The system
should require the Telecoms and ISPs to notify their customers when personal
information has been lost. But Peter Hustinx wants to go further and asked
for the system to apply not only to &amp;quot;providers of public electronic
communication services in public networks but also to other actors,
especially to providers of information society services which process
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/spam/eu">EU directive on privacy and electronic communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:21:05 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: CoE - The Good, the Bad and the Ugly</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/coe-good-bad-ugly</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/958&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 9th meeting of the Council of Europe (CoE) group of specialists on Human
Rights in the Information Society (MC-S-IS) was held in Strasbourg from 31
March to 2 April 2008. At the same time, on 1-2 April, another division of
the CoE was holding in a building across the street its 2008 Octopus
conference on cooperation against cybercrime. This schedule overlapping is
not the only sign that CoE&#039;s left hand seems to ignore what its right hand
is doing: different divisions are also addressing same issues, though from
different points of view and with different results.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It happened this time with the guidelines for Internet Service Providers
(ISPs). While the Octopus conference was discussing and then adopting its
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:22:40 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: The battle for Sound Copyright</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.5/battle-sound-copyright</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/917&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Commissioner Charlie McCreevy&#039;s announcement in February 2008 that he
proposes to nearly double the term of copyright protection for sound
recordings from 50 to 95 years came as a shock to UK digital rights
campaigners. Back in 2006, here in the UK, the case against copyright
term extension was robustly made - by campaigners such as my
organisation, the Open Rights Group, and more importantly, by
economists from one of the UK&#039;s leading universities. It led to a firm
commitment from our Government that they would never seek to extend
copyright term retrospectively.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There is no case for copyright term extension. Term extension would
reduce, yet again, the size of the public domain, harming public
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google completes the DoubleClick deal after EC clears the acquisition</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.5/google-buys-doubleclick</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/909&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Commission (EC) announced on 11 March 2008 that it has
cleared the Google-DoubleClick deal after its investigation made according
with the EU Merger Regulation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The decision of the EC considered that &amp;quot;found that Google and DoubleClick
were not exerting major competitive constraints on each other&#039;s activities
and could, therefore, not be considered as competitors at the moment. Even
if DoubleClick could become an effective competitor in online intermediation
services, it is likely that other competitors would continue to exert
sufficient competitive pressure after the merger. The Commission therefore
concluded that the elimination of DoubleClick as a potential competitor
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European Commission closes enquiry on Apple</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/ec-apple-closed</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/827&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Commission (EC) has closed the enquiry against Apple for
charging more UK users than other EU users for downloads of its iTunes
music, following the company announcement on 9 January 2008 that it will
reduce download prices for UK within 6 months to align them with prices in
continental Europe.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A formal investigation had been opened by the EC against Apple after
&#039;Which?&#039;, a UK consumer protection organisation, filed a complaint in
September 2004 against the company who was applying 20% higher prices to
British users than for the other European users. The difference has
decreased in time reaching down to 6% and, following discussions between
Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes and Apple chief executive Steve Jobs,
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Opera complains to the EC on Microsoft&#039;s Internet Explorer</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.24/opera-commission-microsoft</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/798&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As a result of a complaint made by the Norwegian web browser developer Opera
Software ASA, the European Commission will examine under the antitrust
regulation Microsoft&#039;s abuse in distributing the browser Internet Explorer
with the Windows operating system.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Opera Software states that Microsoft does not follow accepted web standards
and therefore hinders programme developers in making programs that work with
each other. In spite its many innovations in the field, the Norwegian
company, although successful in making browsers for mobile phones, has
failed to gain a share of the browser market on the Internet which is
dominated by Microsoft&#039;s Internet Explorer. &amp;quot;Microsoft&#039;s unilateral control
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The broadcasting treaty resuscitated by the Council of Europe</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.24/coe-broadcasting-treaty</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/796&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Pending the approval of its Committee of Ministers, the Council of Europe
will try to promote a new broadcasting international document, building on
the failed convention for the protection of broadcasting signals of the
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As WIPO&#039;s 184 members have failed in agreeing upon a text for the treaty and
as the conference for a full negotiation planned for November 2007 was
postponed at the request of several member states and the European
Broadcasting Union, the Council of Europe intends to proceed on reinforcing
the initial WIPO recommendations on the matter. &amp;quot;I suspect that Council of
Europe member states would be very happy if the WIPO deadlock were overcome
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Creative content online - main topic in new EC documents</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.24/creative-content</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/793&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A new policy paper drafted by the European Commission (EC) shows its
intention to promote new measures to fight against illegal file-sharing,
taking as a positive example the French agreement between ISPs and the
record industries already presented in EDRI-gram.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The policy paper obtained by EurActiv and entitled &amp;quot;Creative content online
in the Single Market&amp;quot; wants to involve all the stakeholders in the
activities against piracy: &amp;quot;It seems appropriate to instigate co-operation
procedures between access and service providers, right holders and
consumers&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Commission communication also talks about the development of new legal
offers of digital content available for consumers, educational programs to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RFID and Informed Consent - Using and removing of RFID functionality</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/rfid-informed-consent</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/768&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Following the the EDRi statements on RFID Privacy Issues and RFID Security
Issues published earlier this year, EDRi recently contributed with a third
written statement to the European Commission&#039;s RFID Expert Group focusing on
RFID and Informed Consent.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In this paper, EDRi deals with the possibilities of informing individuals
about RFID use and strongly asks for a strict opt-in regime for RFID usage.
Furthermore various mechanisms for removing, altering or disabling RFID
functionality are discussed and evaluated with respect to the protection of
personal data.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Finally, EDRi suggests a concept of responsibilities to ensure that RFID
technology is only disseminated to organisations that
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/rfid">RFID</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recommended Reading</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.22/reading</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/751&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)16 of the Committee of
Ministers to member states on measures to promote the public service value
of the Internet, adopted on 7 November 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CM/Rec&quot;&gt;https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CM/Rec&lt;/a&gt;(2007)16
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Council of Europe Submission to the Internet Governance Forum, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil, 12-15 November 2007, &amp;quot;Building a free and safe
Internet&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coe.int/t/dc/files/events/internet/&quot;&gt;http://www.coe.int/t/dc/files/events/internet/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: CoE - Content Regulation: Break On Through; IPR: It&#039;s Tricky</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.22/coe-content-regulation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/750&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 8th meeting of the Council of Europe (CoE) group of specialists on Human
Rights in the Information Society (MC-S-IS) was held in Strasbourg on 29-30
October 2007. It was mainly dedicated to discussing draft documents on
technical measures and their impact on human rights and particularly freedom
of expression. Two areas were more specifically addressed: content
regulation and intellectual property.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In its position of independent NGO observer to the CoE MC-S-IS, EDRI voices
its concerns when needed, including loudly by running campaigns, like the
recent one against a new Recommendation failing to uphold online freedom of
expression (Rec(2007)11). In this campaign, EDRI statement was endorsed by
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
