<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Freedom of speech</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/23/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Italian blog closed by Police</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.12/italy-blog-closed</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1022&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 6 June 2008, the blog of the Italian journalist Antonino Monteleone was
closed, without notification, by the Polizia Postale of Calabria under
accusations of defamation, but the journalist claims that this action came
after having posted uncomfortable information on political figures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The whole story started in 2006 after the elections, when the blogger posted
extracts from a document containing CVs of candidates for the Italian
Parliament. The document included information of certain names on the
nomination list that had previous relations to cases of power abuse and
manipulation of
tenders or even with mafia activities. On 9 December 2006, Monteleone posted
an article on Galati, member of UDP party then, undersecretary in the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:45:53 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>France obtained ISPs support in blocking illegal sites</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.12/isp-france-block-sites</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1020&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
French Interior Minister Michel Alliot-Marie announced on 10 June 2008 that
the French state had come to an agreement with the French ISPs to block
sites carrying pedophilic content or content related to terrorism and
racial hatred. &amp;quot;We can no longer tolerate the sexual exploitation of
children in the form of cyber-pedophilia. We have come to an agreement:
the access to child pornography sites will be blocked in France. Other
democracies have done it. France could wait no longer&amp;quot; said the minister.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The plan will be put into force in September by the creation of a blacklist
on the basis of information received from Internet users on sites that carry
offensive material. Internet users will be able, via a platform, to signal
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:43:43 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: A new &quot;NSA FRAnchise&quot; set up in Sweden?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.11/nsa-fra-sweden</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1013&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Lex Orwell, a law proposal for total surveillance, is urgently being
pushed to a vote on 17 June 2008 by national security hawks in the
peaceful Kingdom of Sweden. It will mandate the &amp;quot;NSA franchise&amp;quot;, the
FRA, to turn its forest of parabola ears and world&#039;s 5th largest super
computer to listen to you - or rather what you do, say and share on the
Internet - would an information package pass the Swedish borders.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
FRA is the Swedish shorthand for The National Defence Radio
Establishment. An institution very active during the cold war but
without a clear task or purpose today since material from satellite
traffic from military activities the Baltics isn&#039;t particularly a la
mode any more. To stay in business, FRA has therefore for years pursued
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:04:51 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Radio Free Europe&#039;s websites in Belarus under attack</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.9/radio-free-europe-belarus</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/982&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Several Radio Free Europe websites were under a distributed denial of
service (DDoS) attack in the past week. The attacks started on 26 April
2008, the 22nd anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, primary
targeted at the Belarus Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) service
which was offering live coverage of a rally of protest organized in Minsk
against the plight of uncompensated victims and a government decision to
build a new nuclear plant.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Martins Zvaners, RFE spokesman, thinks that was the largest attack ever
experienced by RFE. At its peak, the DDoS attack was sending more than 50000
requests to the RFE sites, flooding its servers&#039; capacity and throwing them
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:41:04 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More control over the Internet wanted in Russia</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.9/internet-control-russia</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/980&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Russian prosecutor&#039;s office wants to extend the anti-extremism laws to
the Internet, proposing an amendment to the rules that presently govern
printed media on the basis of which newspapers considered by the court to
have published extremist material can be shut down.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In terms of the new proposal, which began circulating in the State Duma&#039;s
Security Committee on 10 April 2008, any kind of material considered
extremist or website deemed to have hosted extremist material should be
blocked by ISPs. If found guilty of repeatedly hosting extremist materials,
the website will be shut down. A list of extremist Internet-based materials
and sites must be regularly made available and the ISPs will be bound to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:37:27 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>France considering new rules for web 2.0</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/france-rules-web2.0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/969&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A French Parliamentary report suggests a change in the law (LCEN) that
implements the European Directive on e-commerce in order to make clearer the
distinction between editing and hosting activities in the new applications
related to Web 2.0.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The report of the Deputy Jean Dionis du Séjour on the application of the
LCEN was updated on 16 April 2008, after the first version was submitted to
the Parliament on 23 January. The update concerns some of the latest court
decisions in France that established the responsibility of some websites for
others&#039; RSS feeds or for user-generated content. The report specifies that
the law has created a hosting status that is different from that of an
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:28:44 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Russian Government wants to control all WiFi devices</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/russia-control-wifi</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/965&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 14 April 2008, Fontanka.ru online newspaper reported that
Rossvyazokhrankultura, the Russian Mass Media, Communications and Cultural
Protection Service, intends to ask for the mandatory registration of all
WiFi devices, including personal home networks, notebook computers, mobile
telephones and PDAs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Vladimir Karpov, the deputy director of the agency&#039;s communications
monitoring division, told the newspaper that wireless Internet users will
have to register any electronics using WiFi technology. The registration
could take as long as ten days for standard devices like PDAs and laptops
and the noncompliance may bring forth the confiscation of the respective
equipment. Users wanting to operate a wireless access point or a
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:23:03 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Internet content blacklisted in Europe</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/internet-content-blacklist</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/964&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Ministers of Justice and Internal Affairs have agreed to make
publishing bomb-making instructions on the Internet a crime. The French
authorities are discussing making the publication on the Internet of any
alleged pro-anorexia information a crime.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Justice and interior ministers from the EU member states backed a proposal
from Commissioner Frattini to harmonise the normative acts that will make
the &amp;quot;public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment, and
training for terrorism&amp;quot; a crime. According to the statements of the EU
officials publishing these acts on the Internet completed the European
legislation in this domain. They described the Internet as &amp;quot;a virtual
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:22:03 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: CoE - The Good, the Bad and the Ugly</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/coe-good-bad-ugly</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/958&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 9th meeting of the Council of Europe (CoE) group of specialists on Human
Rights in the Information Society (MC-S-IS) was held in Strasbourg from 31
March to 2 April 2008. At the same time, on 1-2 April, another division of
the CoE was holding in a building across the street its 2008 Octopus
conference on cooperation against cybercrime. This schedule overlapping is
not the only sign that CoE&#039;s left hand seems to ignore what its right hand
is doing: different divisions are also addressing same issues, though from
different points of view and with different results.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It happened this time with the guidelines for Internet Service Providers
(ISPs). While the Octopus conference was discussing and then adopting its
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:22:40 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>France: Linking can be damaging to your pockets</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/linking-decison-france</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/953&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A recent decision by the Paris Tribunal has condemned 3 different French
websites for linking to another website containing gossip information on the
French actor Olivier Martinez.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The actor has decided to sue 3 websites (Fuzz.fr, Vivre-en-normandie.com and
CroixRousse.net) for linking to external websites that presented the
respective information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Fuzz.fr is a Digg-like website, where the website users can vote which news
comes on first. However, the court decided that the owner of the website has
an editorial responsibility, even if it&#039;s a digg-like service, and forced
him to pay 1000 euros as damages for infringing the actor&#039;s privacy and 1500
euros as legal fees.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:14:33 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ireland: Music industry sues ISP, demands filtering</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.5/ireland-isp-filtering</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/910&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EMI, Sony, Warner and Universal have sued Ireland&#039;s largest ISP, Eircom,
demanding that it install filters to prevent users from illegally sharing or
downloading music. The action was admitted by Mr. Justice Peter Kelly to the
Commercial Court, meaning that it will be heard on an expedited basis.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Eircom has said that it is not on notice of specific illegal activity that
infringed the rights of the companies and has no legal obligation to monitor
traffic on its network. Previously the music companies had sought to have
Eircom voluntarily install software such as that produced by Audible Magic,
which will &amp;quot;fingerprint&amp;quot; music files, but Eircom refused indicating that it
could not run that software on its servers.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Finnish web censorship</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.4/finland-web-censorship</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/890&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As of 1 January 2007 a law took effect in Finland allowing the Police to
maintain a secret blacklist of child porn sites and distribute it to ISPs so
that these may block access to those sites. Use of the lists is ostensibly
voluntary to ISPs, but there have been rather strong hints of making it
mandatory if not adopted otherwise. After a slow start, Police actually
started distributing the list late last year and several ISPs have began
using them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In February 2008, the police added the site lapsiporno.info to the
blacklist. Despite the name (Lapsiporno means &amp;quot;child porn&amp;quot; in Finnish), the
website contains no child or any other kind of porn, but criticism of
censorship and a partial collection of addresses from the officially secret
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>French Police extends the Internet blacklist</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.4/french-internet-blacklist</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/886&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
French Internal Affairs Minister, Michèle Alliot-Marie, announced on 14
February 2008 new measures to fight against cybercrime, including extending
the websites blacklist and pushing for computer online investigations,
without the permission of the country of the hosting company.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Minister visited the Cybercrime Brigade that is located in Nanntere and
announced a new &amp;quot;best practices chart&amp;quot; with the operators in order to block
websites. According to the statements, the Norwegian model was taken into
consideration, meaning the creation of a list with websites not only with
child pornography information, but also the ones with information on making
explosives or chemical weapons, terrorist propaganda and racial hate speech.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PirateBay - blocked in Denmark</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.3/piratebay-denmark</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/863&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Following a complaint by IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic
Industry), a Danish bailiff court issued on 4 February 2008 an injunction
ordering Tele2, one of the major ISPs in Denmark, to block the access to the
PirateBay domains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
IFPI asked the court for this injunction because most of the materials
referred on PirateBay are copyrighted and the exchange of these materials
between PirateBay users is illegal. IFPI considered that Tele2 was not
directly liable for the illegal copying, but was contributing to it, by
making temporary copies of torrent files.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tele2 has been complying with the injunction so far by DNS filtering (same
method as used in the child pornography filters and AllOfMp3), but is
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>YouTube blocked once more in Turkey</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.2/youtube-turkey</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/841&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
An order issued by a Turkish court on 17 January 2008 blocked once again the
access to Google&#039;s YouTube Web site on account of allegedly insulting clips
referring to the country&#039;s founding father, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The ban lasted for 6 days and as no statements have been made by Turk
Telekom which has implemented the ban or by YouTube representatives, it is
not yet known whether the ban was lifted because the clips under question
were removed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The situation seems to be a repeated pattern as YouTube was first banned in
March 2007 for similar allegations until the video considered disrespectful
were removed by the site. A second time, in September, a Turkish court from
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
