<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Biometrics</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/22/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Massive mobilization against EDVIGE, the new French database</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/edvige-french-database</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1053&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Remember the movie &#039;Das Leben der Anderen&#039; (The Lives of Others), where a
Stasi agent was monitoring a playwriter&#039;s life? This doesn&#039;t translate
anymore in French into &#039;La vie des autres&#039;, but rather into EDVIGE, the name
of a newly created database to be used by French intelligence services and
the administrative police.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EDVIGE will file &amp;quot;individuals, groups, organisations and moral persons
which, due to their individual or collective activity, are likely to attempt
to public order&amp;quot;. Not only these persons will be filed (without any offence
committed), but also &amp;quot;those who undertake or have undertaken direct and non
fortuitous relations with them.&amp;quot; Filing starts at age 13.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:59:42 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Complaint against the French govt to annul the biometric passport decree</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/complaint-french-biometric-passport</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1048&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Two French associations, EDRi-member Imaginons un réseau internet solidaire
(IRIS) and Ligue des droits de l&#039;Homme (LDH), have filed a complaint
against the French government before the highest administrative Court. They
ask the French Conseil d&#039;État to annul the decree issued on 30 April 2008 by
the French government on biometric passports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The associations consider the decree had been issued under an irregular
procedure by  publishing the Opinion in the Official Journal 6 days after
the
decree had been published, instead of presenting them at the same time, as
required by law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The provisions of the decree stipulate the collection of eight fingerprints
for passport applicants starting with 6 years old children and the creation
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:53:37 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The French Government goes against CNIL in biometric passports</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.10/cnil-biometric-passports</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/992&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ignoring the opinion of the French Data Protection Authority - the National
Commission for Information and Liberties (CNIL), on 4 May 2008, the French
Government passed  a decree on the basis of which the French citizens will
have biometric passports that will include eight fingerprints and a digital
picture. The data will be introduced in a large national database.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Although symbolical, CNIL&#039;s opinion should have been published alongside
with such a decree in the Official Journal. The Government&#039;s decree went
against CNIL&#039;s unfavourable opinion given on 11 December 2007 which was
published a week after the decree. Alex Türk, president of CNIL reinforced
the commission&#039;s position on 16 May 2008, on the occasion of the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:36:15 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Automatic face recognition in UK airports</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.9/face-recognition-uk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/981&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Starting this summer, the UK Border Agency will use facial recognition
technology at automated unmanned gates. A machine would accept or reject the
match between the scan and the computer information on people with biometric
passports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The pilot project will be open to UK and EU citizens holding new biometric
passports. &amp;quot;We think a machine can do a better job (than manned passport
inspections). What will the public reaction be? Will they use it? We need to
test and see how people react and how they deal with rejection. We hope to
get the trial up and running by the summer&amp;quot; said Gary Murphy, head of
operational design and development for the UK Border Agency, during a
biometrics-related conference that took place in London in April 2008.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology">New technology</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:39:36 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The European Commission continues to pressure for early fingerprinting</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/ec-fingerprinting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/957&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In spite of the recommendation of the European Data Protection Supervisor,
Peter Hustinx, that the minimum age for fingerprinting should be 14, a
spokesperson from the European Commission (EC) expressed on 2 April 2008 the
EC intention to push for fingerprinting children starting at the age of six,
in order to include the information in the biometric passports.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Jacques Barrot, the Justice, Freedom and Security Commissioner, considered
that &amp;quot;The proposals we put forward are balanced ones&amp;quot;, explaining that
fingerprinting was an important tool in fighting human trafficking.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
During the meeting on 12 February 2008 the high-level Strategic Committee on
Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum (SCIFA)/Mixed Committee discussed the age
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:21:40 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fingerprinting the fingerprint proponent</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/fingerprint-schauble</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/954&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EDRi-member Chaos Computer Club (CCC) - Germany has published in the latest
issue of their magazine Die Datenschleuder the fingerprint of one of the
best known proponents of digital fingerprints in passports - Mr. Wolfgang
Schäuble, the German Minister of Internal Affairs. The fingerprint has been
printed on a plastic foil, that can replicate the fingerprint when it is
pressed on a biometric reader.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
CCC activists wanted to make a point in their fight against digital
fingerprints in any ID document, considering such data is easy to collect
and reproduce. Despite the numerous warnings, since November 2007 the German
passports have included a biometric chip containing fingerprints that can be
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:18:22 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recommended Reading</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.6/reading</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/944&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EDPS Opinion on biometrics in passports: exemptions welcomed but
unsatisfactory
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The EDPS welcomes the introduction of exemptions from giving fingerprints
based on the age of the person or his/her inability to provide fingerprints.
These exemptions are part of the fallback procedures that should be
implemented. However, the EDPS still considers these exemptions as
insufficient to remedy the imperfections of biometrics, such as the impact
of misidentification or failure to enrol.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Peter Hustinx, EDPS, says: &amp;quot;The fact that the Commission took into account
the need for fallback procedures, stated in previous opinions, is more than
welcomed. These exemptions are however still unsatisfactory. They fail to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Information Commissioner warns against fingerprinting at new UK terminal</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.6/ico-heathrow-terminal-5</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/938&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Mr. Richard Thomas, UK Information Commissioner warned Heathrow airport
operator BAA that the plans to fingerprint all passengers at the new
Terminal 5 may breach the UK Data Protection Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 5.5 billion euro worth Terminal 5 was opened by the Queen on 16 March
and is due to receive its first passengers on 27 March 2008. The airport
plans to apply security measures that involve fingerprinting all passengers
including domestic ones claiming fingerprinting was necessary so that all
passengers could mix freely in Terminal 5 shopping mall area. Fingerprinting
is already being applied for domestic passengers at Terminal 1. The
passengers place a hand on a scanner which records four fingerprints and
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Biometric data from non-EU travellers</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.3/biometric-eu-travel</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/862&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A set of new measures including biometric data from non-EU travellers are
being proposed these days by the European Commission (EC). The proposals,
drafted by Franco Frattini, the European Commissioner for Justice, Freedom
and Security, are being put forward by the EC, arguing that the cross-border
policy has to be revised to face the new challenges related to terrorism,
organised crime and illegal migration.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The package proposes the creation of an entry/exit register of non-European
visitors to the EU bloc that will record the dates of entry and exit of each
non-EU individual admitted to the Schengen visa-free area using biometric
identifiers. In cases when a person&#039;s visa has expired, an alert can be
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Key privacy concerns in France 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.2/privacy-france-2007</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/847&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
6 January 2008 was the 30th anniversary of the French Data Protection Act.
But no one really cared. The only French contribution to this 2nd European
DP day has been the publication by the CNIL (French DP Authority) of a poll
result that it commissioned in November 2007. The poll indicates that 50% of
the asked persons know the CNIL. However, only 26% of them feel they are
informed well enough on their rights in terms of personal data protection,
and 61% consider that the constitution of databases is breaching their right
to privacy. Moreover, a former study on Internet usages conducted in June
2007 reveals that the mostly cited barrier to Internet use is the fear that
personal data are not protected enough (by 29% of the Internet users and 23%
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Key privacy concerns in Czech Republik 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.2/privacy-czech-2007</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/845&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last year has seen an increased number attempts from government bodies to
extend their powers and make it easier to access people&#039;s private
information. To name a few, there were legal proposals to increase the
number of agencies authorized to access and process electronic
communication data collected by telecommunication companies under the
Data Retention law, national DNA database enlargement, plans for various
administrative database sharing, introduction of even more CCTV systems
and the pressure on air travel operators to share records about their
passengers. The introduction of biometric into travel documents data as a
mean of identification and the use of contactless chip technologies
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK DNA database errors raise concerns</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/uk-dna-database-error</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/770&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The largest DNA database in the world covering details on about 4.5 million
people including information on every person arrested, convicted or not, and
on 900 000 children raises questions as inaccuracies and administrative
errors have been found in its records.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Incorrect dates, spelling mistakes and duplications have been found by Data
Quality and Integrity Team of the DNA database unit. These mistakes can lead
to innocent people being accused of crimes and wrongly arrested. Information
added to incorrect profiles has also obliged the police to erase affected
records.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The DNA Database Unit had also admitted in a report in May 2007 that between
1995 and 2005 it failed to load 26 200 records to the DNA database because
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DNA tests approved by French Constitutional council</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.22/dna-french-law</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/745&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In a decision published on 15 November 2007, the French Constitutional
council approved the introduction of DNA testing in the new immigration law
to prove family links for foreign candidates applying for a more than 3
months visa on family regrouping grounds. However, it has further restricted
their use, making two explicit reservations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The first reservation makes this provision irrelevant when family links with
the mother can be proven by any other legal mean under the law of the
mother&#039;s country. The second reservation forbids any systematic application
of DNA testing, since the Council reminds that all other means to prove
family links should be used first by French consulates.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Update on DNA and biometrics in French immigration law</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.20/dna-french-immigration-law</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/694&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With its final vote on 23 October 2007, the French Parliament
confirmed the introduction of DNA testing in the new immigration law to
prove family links for foreign candidates applying for a more than 3
months visa on family regrouping grounds. The only recourse could now
be a decision from the French Constitutional Council to remove this
provision from the law, since the Parliamentary opposition
(Socialists, Communists and Greens), together with some centrist
members of Parliament, announced that it would challenge the adopted
law before the Constitutional judge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The final vote occurred after a Parliamentary Commission agreed on
the harmonisation of the draft texts resulting from both the National
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:42:27 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recommanded Reading</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.18/reading</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Data Protection Framework Decision: EDPS concerned about dilution of Data
Protection standards&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/EDPS/PressNews/Press/2007/EDPS-2007-10-EN_DPFD.pdf&quot;&gt;http://edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/EDPS...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nuffield Council on Bioethics : The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical
issues. This Report considers whether current police powers in the UK to
take and retain bioinformation are justified by the need to fight crime.
Executive Summary&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/The_forensic_use_of_bioinformation_-_Executive_Summary.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/The_forensic_use_of_b...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Full Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/The_forensic_use_of_bioinformation_-_ethical_issues.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/The_forensic_use_of_b...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:17:36 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
