<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Collecting societies</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/19/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>EC wants to provide freedom for the authors from collecting societies</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.15/collecting-societies-commission</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1068&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Against the high pressure from rights managers, the European Commission
decided to ban certain copyright handling practices, mainly the obligation
of an author not to move from a collective society to another.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 16 July 2007, Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes asked 24 European
collecting societies managing copyright on behalf of music authors to
eliminate the clause from their contracts preventing authors from moving to
another collecting society.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Commission had opened an investigation following complaints from
broadcasting group RTL and the UK online music provider Music Choice. In
February 2007, the Commission sent a formal statement of objections to the
International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC)
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:28:58 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: The battle for Sound Copyright</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.5/battle-sound-copyright</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/917&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Commissioner Charlie McCreevy&#039;s announcement in February 2008 that he
proposes to nearly double the term of copyright protection for sound
recordings from 50 to 95 years came as a shock to UK digital rights
campaigners. Back in 2006, here in the UK, the case against copyright
term extension was robustly made - by campaigners such as my
organisation, the Open Rights Group, and more importantly, by
economists from one of the UK&#039;s leading universities. It led to a firm
commitment from our Government that they would never seek to extend
copyright term retrospectively.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There is no case for copyright term extension. Term extension would
reduce, yet again, the size of the public domain, harming public
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EC public consultation of Creative Content Online</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/creative-content-online</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/820&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 3 January 2008, the European Commission (EC) launched a public
consultation for the preparation of a recommendation on Creative Content
Online to be adopted by the European Parliament and Council that calls
for a common legal environment for online content, proposing multi-territory
licences.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the opinion of the European Commission, EU policies should support the
rapid implementation of &amp;quot;new services and related business models for the
creation and circulation of European content and knowledge online.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As a result of the public consultation on &amp;quot;Content Online in the Single
Market&amp;quot; launched by the EC in July 2006, there were several calls for the
encouragement of the cooperation between industry, right holders and
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No decision yet from the EC on the status of the online music market</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.24/online-music-market</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/795&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
During a conference on creative rights and cultural diversity organised by
EUobserver on 6 December 2007, José Manuel Barroso, the President of the
European Commission, stated the European Commission (EC) was not yet ready
to take any short-term decision related to the management of the online
music market.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Despite new calls at the conference to review the voluntary guidelines on
the collective management of online music rights issued in 2005 by the EC
and supported by collective rights managers (CRMs), Barroso said the EC
needed some time to find the right solutions based on a balanced,
sustainable consensus of all the involved stakeholders.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The guidelines are not legally binding for the EU states and, according to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European Commission investigates Apple&#039;s European prices</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.18/ec-apple-prices</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The representatives of the European Commission (EC) had a closed meeting
last week with Apple and other four major record companies, regarding the
different pricing schemes used in different countries in Europe.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The meeting should have lasted for two days, but two record companies EMI
Group and Warner Music Group decided they didn&#039;t need to show up in the oral
hearings, considering the EC had been &amp;quot;persuaded that they are not
responsible for how Apple prices songs&amp;quot;. Therefore the meeting lasted just
one day with Apple&#039;s iTunes global president Eddy Cue and general counsel
Donald Rosenberg that joined Universal Music and Sony BMG.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to a Reuters source, an Apple representative said during the
meeting that &amp;quot;there was nothing in its contract with Universal obliging it
to operate national stores or to set a higher price in countries such as
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:15:14 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Allofmp3.com director acquitted by Moscow Court</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.16/allofmp3-acuitted</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/607&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Denis Kvasov, head of Mediaservices, owner of music website Allofmp3.com was
acquitted by a Moscow court after having been brought to trial by
entertainment companies EMI Group Plc, NBC Universal and Time Warner Inc.
for copyright offences.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 15 August 2007, district judge Yekaterina Sharapova ruled that Denis
Kvasov had not infringed the Russian law. &amp;quot;The prosecution did not succeed
in presenting persuasive evidence of his involvement in infringing copyright
law,&amp;quot; said the judge. She considered the arguments of the plaintiffs as
unconvincing and contradictory. Also, no evidence was produced to prove the
purchase and storage of counterfeit phonograms or the conversion of the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:56:24 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Media and telecom companies oppose CISAC proposal</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.14/telecom-oppose-cisac</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/578&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 10 July 2007, the EU Commission received a letter from a large group
including some of Europe&#039;s biggest media groups and telecom companies urging
for the rejection of an offer made by EU national royalty-collecting
societies to settle an anti-trust case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Commission started examining a model contract for public performance
rights between the collecting societies members of CISAC (the International
Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers) as a result of a
complaint made in 2003 by digital music distribution platform Music Choice
Europe.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The complaint concerned the fact that the authors were obliged to transfer
their rights only to their own national collecting society and that the
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:38:17 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recommended Action</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.9/action</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/479&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Public consultation on the Regulation regarding public access to European
Parliament, Council and Commission documents (Regulation 1049/2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/511&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en&quot;&gt;http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/511&amp;amp;...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/revision/index_en.htm&quot;&gt;http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/revision/index_en.htm&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For Dutch readers - Petition for more flexible contracts for members of
the rights collecting society which allow them to choose the conditions
under which to release their own music and use CC licenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/bumawakeup/&quot;&gt;http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/bumawakeup/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Copyright clearing for EU digital libraries project</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.8/copyright-digital-libraries</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/462&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 18 April 2007, a copyright handling model for digitalised works was
agreed by EU High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries including major
stakeholders such as the Federation of European Publishers, the British
Library, the German national library and Google.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The High Level Expert Group, founded in 2006 by Viviane Reding, the
Commissioner for Information Society and Media, advises the Commission on
issues regarding digitisation, online accessibility and digital preservation
of cultural material. This action is part of the European Digital Library
initiative adopted by the European Commission in June 2005 in order to
preserve European cultural and scientific heritage making them available
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:40:28 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Belgium court backs decision against Google</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.3/google-belgium</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/402&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the case brought by Copiepresse, a trade group representing 17 Belgium
newspapers, against Google for publishing links to newspaper articles
without permission, the Brussels Tribunal upheld its previous decision and
ruled that Google violated the copyright law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Google was ordered to remove Belgian newspaper content from its search
engine results. The search engine is no longer allowed to refer to articles,
pictures or drawings of Copiepress members without previous agreements that
are to be negociated, non-compliance being fined by 25 000 Euros per day.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The ruling also says that  any other copyright holder could get in touch
with Google and notify its copyright infringement. In this case Google has
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IPRED Directive Implementation in Italy</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.13/italyipred</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/183&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
By Legislative Decree no.140 of 16 March 2006, with more than one
month before the deadline, Italy implemented Directive 2004/48/EC on the
enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRED) by amending law
no.633/1941, which has already been the subject of so many modifications
since its inception that several parties are calling for its complete
re-drafting.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The most notable modifications to the Italian copyright law include the
presumption of ownership of the neighbouring rights, as it was already
the case for author&#039;s rights; the possibility for collective and
&amp;quot;representative&amp;quot; organizations to independently promote judicial actions in
order to defend their members&#039; rights; the possibility to ask judges to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:38:18 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google&#039;s victory in court against German publisher</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.13/googlegermany</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/181&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Google has just obtained a significant victory against the German publisher
Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG), having asked an injunction in a
German court to stop the giant from scanning books in its Books Library
project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
WBG dropped their case on 28 June after the judge told them they had poor
chances in winning. Although backed by the German publishers associations,
the publisher failed to bring arguments in support of its action and the
court ruled that there was no copyright violation resulting from the
development of Google&#039;s project.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Google has undertaken to digitize library books and place the contents on
its search engine working within this process with six US libraries and one
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:35:10 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Private copy system under scrutiny</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.11/privatecopy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The issue of the private copy remuneration system is becoming a subject of
debate for interest groups from all over the world.  L&#039;AEPO-ARTIS grouping
27 associations of artists of Europe, the International Federation of
Musicians and the International Federation of Actors took a stand in the
support of the present private copy levy system.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to the artists associations, the present private copy system
&amp;quot;significantly supports the cultural domain&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;a flexible system combining
freedom for consumers and legitimate revenues for the copyright owners&amp;quot;
being &amp;quot;vital for interpreters in the exploitation of their interpretation&amp;quot;.
Replacing the fees on private copy, which brought income to the artists,
with DRM, which allows copying only within a system approved by its
producer, is profitable only for the industry selling DRM systems and not to
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:54:05 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Content flatrate is feasible according to French study</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.11/contentflatrate</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Nothing in the national law and international obligations prevents states
from permitting file-sharing as long as they subject it to a levy. This is
the conclusion of a legal feasibility study under the supervision of Prof.
André Lucas, the most renowned copyright scholar in France.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The study on the feasibility of compensation for peer-to-peer file-sharing,
first released in French in June 2005, has been translated into English for
wider accessibility. The translation has been conducted at the initiative of
the German advocacy group privatkopie.net with the support of BEUC, the
European Consumers&#039;s Organisation, and Stiftung Bridge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The analysis concludes that downloading is covered by the private copying
exception, provided that the existing system of remuneration is adapted.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:47:07 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Three Spanish courts uphold validity of music free licenses</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.9/spaincc</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Spanish courts have upheld three times already the validity of
music free licenses. In the three cases, the Sociedad General de
Autores (SGAE), Spanish music copyright collecting society, sued some open
public premises on alleged rights to the music listened therein.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In all the three cases, the defences demonstrated that the music played was
downloaded from the Internet and was under free licenses. The Spanish
system presumes that SGAE holds the right to represent all authors,
unless the contrary is proven.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The defendants in the three cases proved that the music downloaded from
Internet and burnt into CDs was carefully chosen as free licensed music.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the first resolution, dated on the 2 February 2006, the term
&amp;quot;Copy left&amp;quot; appears for first time in a Spanish resolution. The SGAE
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 19:22:04 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
